Picture
I reacted differently though out the story.  When Mathilde kept asking Mme. Forester “ You haven’t anything else?” It made me feel like she wasn’t appreciative that Mme. Forester was being kind and lending her jewelry.  It seemed that she was being greedy and selfish, as she always wanted more or the best.  But then my view on Mathilde changed when she paid for a replacement necklace and she had to work of her debt for ten years.  She showed great loyalty and wanted to make up for the lost necklace which makes me think that she really does care for others and not just about herself.  I think I understand that she wanted to replace the jewelry that she had mistakenly lost but didn’t want her friend to get upset.  However, I do feel like she should have been honest with Mme. Forester in the first place and then she would have found out that instead of being worth thirty-six thousand francs the false diamond necklace was only worth five hundred.


Alison
9/13/2013 06:22:52 am

I thought this was really great. I can relate to how your view changed on Mathilde throughout the story. I couldn't really find anything wrong so, good job! :)

Reply
Willa
9/13/2013 06:24:24 am

Very good!
one thing:in the second sentence you have "her" before mme. Forester, is that supposed to be there?

I really like it :)
- Willa

Reply



Leave a Reply.